Screening for Avian Leukosis Virus
Subgroup-J
Summary
The objective of this document is to clarify how to use the
FlockChek* Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J Antibody Test Kit (IDEXX
ALV-J) and the interpretation of results obtained under monitoring
programs for parent stocks or broiler breeders. The following are key
points to consider when establishing a program to eliminate, eradicate
or determine the presence of avian leukosis virus subgroup J (ALV-J)
when using the IDEXX ALV-J
Test Kit:
ELISA should be used as a screening tool. As with
any screening tool, the focus is on sensitivity, so some level of
nonspecific reactors can be expected. Any positive result with this
test must be followed by a more specific test, such as virus
isolation, with samples from the same flock of birds that showed
positive ELISA results.
- A positive result on the ALV-J antibody test kit does not
necessarily mean that there is virus in the flock. For clinical ALV-J
disease to be present in a flock, a replicating exogenous ALV-J virus
must be present in the population.
- The ALV-J antibody test kit has been developed as a
flock-screening tool. ALV-J status for individual birds cannot be
assessed.
- The ALV-J status of a flock can only be determined by testing for
replicating exogenous virus through virus isolation in C/E chick
embryo fibroblasts with detection on the ALV antigen test. Virus
isolation is considered the gold standard for detection of exogenous
virus. If cloacal swabs, albumin and meconium are tested for ALV p27
antigen, a low level of endogenous viral protein may be detected.
(.)
- ALV-J seroconversion is variable across lines and may be
influenced by endogenous leukosis virus expression. Testing of
meat-type birds less than 10 weeks of age is not
recommended.
- Vertical transmission of ALV-J may result in seronegative, immune
tolerant progeny.
Characteristics, performance and
recommended use
Introduction
ALV-J was isolated in the late 1980s and designated as a unique
subgroup partly based on the heterogeneity of the envelope
glycoprotein as compared to the other ALV subgroup envelope proteins
(Payne et al,1991; Bai et al,1995). Diagnostics used in the
eradication of ALV-J have focused on virus isolation methods or direct
measurement of the virus in cloacal swabs, meconium or albumin. All of
these methods detect group-specific antigen (p27). The basis of the
IDEXX ALV-J Antibody Test Kit is the detection of antibody against the
gp85 envelope protein of ALV-J. The solid-phase antigen used in the
test is recombinant gp85 antigen from ALV-J.
Materials and Methods
The ALV-J antibody ELISA is an indirect format test with gp85
antigen coated on the solid phase and a goat anti-chicken HRPO
conjugate. Samples are diluted 1:500 and then incubated on the plate
for 30 minutes. After a PBS/Tween wash, the conjugate is added to the
plate for an additional 30-minute incubation. Conjugate is washed from
the wells and substrate is added. Sample and control ODs are used to
calculate the sample/positive (S/P) values. S/P values >0.6 are
considered positive.
Samples used to characterize the ELISA were obtained from different
laboratories in which active virus isolation programs for ALV-J were
ongoing. This included multiple commercial and government facilities.
Dr. Aly Fadly (USDA/Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, East
Lansing, MI) provided antisera against ALV subgroups A, B, C, D, E and
J. Additional ALV-A antisera were provided by Dr. Mike Opitz
(University of Maine, Orono, ME). Monoclonal antibody FE.9 was
provided by Dr. K. Venugopal (Institute for Animal Health, Compton
UK).
Results
ALV-J Antibody ELISA: To assess potential
cross-reactivity with antisera against other pathogens, the USDA/NVSL
Avian Specificity Panel was tested on the IDEXX ELISA. This panel
includes antisera against most common poultry pathogens, as well as
some mock vaccine antisera. All samples tested negative on the ALV-J
antibdy ELISA (Table 1 and 2). Specificity of the test on an SPF
population (Figure 1) was 100% (mean S/P= 0.037+0.073), while a field
population of samples from virus isolation-negative flocks (Figure 2)
had a specificity of 99.7% (mean S/P=0.055+0.100).
| Table 1. |
Table 2. |
 |


In a naturally infected ALV-J flock, (virus isolation-positive at
12 weeks of age) significant seroconversion was not seen before
14–18 weeks of age (Figure 3). A review of sixteen virus
isolation-positive flocks, with virus isolation percentages between
1–40% (VI at 10–16 weeks of age), showed seroconversion
percentages of 0–72% (Figure 4). Variable seroconversion levels
may arise from differences in viral shedding, age of the flock when
exposed to the virus and expression of endogenous leukosis sequences.


Discussion
In developing an antibody test for ALV-J, the gp85 envelope protein
was the best candidate antigen because of the significant sequence
difference between the ALV-J gp85 protein as compared to the other ALV
subgroups. Unlike the p27 antigen, in which there is a high degree of
sequence homology between subgroups, the ALV-J gp85 protein shares
only ~40% sequence homology with the other gp85 antigens (Bai et
al,1995). Antisera against the other ALV subgroups do not cross-react
on the IDEXX ALV-J antibody ELISA. Conversely, ALV-J antisera is not
detected by the IDEXX ALV subgroup A & B antibody ELISA (data not
shown).
While the ALV-J antibody ELISA is based on an antigen of UK origin,
we have previously demonstrated reactivity with Hc1 antisera and
antisera against other U.S. origin isolates. (Myrick et al,1999).
Additionally, the recombinant gp85 used in this test was detected on
immunoblots by monoclonals derived from both U.S. and UK origin ALV-J
isolates. The overall specificity of the ALV-J antibody test is
theoretically greater than 99%. However, there have been some reports
of virus isolation-negative flocks in which >20% of the flock has
shown reactivity on the test. These reactors are being investigated
and there is some evidence that they may be associated with expression
of endogenous viral proteins.
Interpretation of Results: The ALV-J antibody
ELISA was developed as a flock-screening tool; it should not be used
to monitor individual birds. Seroconversion can be very slow in lines
that have endogenous ALV (Smith et al, 1990); testing on the ALV-J
antibody ELISA is not recommended before 12–14 weeks. Flock
status must be confirmed with virus isolation. Vertical transmission
can lead to immune tolerant, seronegative progeny.
References
|
TECHNICAL
TIP
|
|
xChek* software available through IDEXX
xChek software available through IDEXX offers a fast, convenient
and easy way to store the data you generate using IDEXX ELISA test
kits. This stored data makes it possible to generate a number of
different reports with ease using the xChek program. For example,
you can look at a certain flock over time (multiple case graph
report), compare one case in several assay types (compare cases
report), or look at the history of control values for a certain kit
lot (control tracking report). All reports have been designed so
that you can modify which variables can be shown on the report
(i.e., s/n, s/p, results) and decide which features will be used
(i.e., block reports and/or graphs). Once a report is generated, it
can be printed, saved or sent by e-mail. These reports can also be
customized with your laboratory's contact information. To do this,
select Options> System Settings in the xChek program and enter the
applicable information.
An example of a Compare Cases Report is shown below and
illustrates many of the options available to the xChek user.


If you need
further information on report generating or xChek software, contact
your IDEXX area manager or local IDEXX technical service
representative.
|
|
| |
|
| |
LEARN
MORE
|
|
To learn more about our products and services, innovative
technologies, trusted service and support, and our global offices,
visit our Web site.
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
VISIT US
AT THE FOLLOWING EVENTS
|
|
Copenhagen, Denmark—August 14–18,
2005
8th
International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis (ICP)
|
| |
|
Macomb, Illinois, USA—August 30th, 2005
15th Annual Swine Conference
|
| |
|
Sonoma, California USA—September
6–9, 2005
SafePork
|
| |
|
Thun, Switzerland—September 13–16,
2005
6th Pestivirus Symposium
|
| |
|
Kloster Banz, Germany—September
14–16, 2005
AVID Congress
|
| |
|
St. Paul, Minnesota USA—September
17–20, 2005
Allen
Leman Swine Conference
|
| |
|
Palma de Mallorca, Spain—September
22–23, 2005
AVEDILA
|
| |
|
Sienna, Italy—September 22–23, 2005
COST855—Diagnosis
and Pathogenesis of Animal Chlamydioses
|
| |
|
Budapest, Hungary—September 25–26,
2005
General
Assembly of the AVEC
|
| |
|
Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil—October
4–8, 2005
ABRAVES
|
| |
|
|