IDEXX > Livestock/Poultry Testing > Newsletter > May 2004 Edition
 

Animal Health Updates

The USDA approved the IDEXX BSE test on March 17, 2004.
This truly second-generation test revolutionizes BSE testing by offering an unmatched combination of performance and ease-of-use. The IDEXX BSE test utilizes a novel prion capture technology—the Seprion ligand—to selectively bind PrPsc in the presence of PrPc from a simple tissue-and-water homogenate.

This technology eliminates the need for the complicated, time-consuming, and potentially error-prone proteinase K sample preparation required by first-generation tests. The test is run entirely at room temperature and does not require incubators or centrifuges.


Our trusted ELISA platform combines this simple homogenization step with a straight-forward EIA, offering results in about 4 hours, with less hands-on time.

Laboratories can choose between a manual platform for low-volume applications, or an automated platform for high-volume applications. The future of BSE testing is here. Please contact us, or visit our Web site for additional information.

 

THE LATEST NEWS

Cow Silhouette In Ruminant Testing

Milk antibody testing

Holstein CowsTesting individual and bulk milk samples is an economic method that is widely used in Europe for surveillance, monitoring and control of infectious diseases in cattle herds and, to a lesser extent, in sheep flocks. Milk samples are readily available in dairy herds; there are no additional costs to the diagnostic procedure for drawing blood samples.1

Bulk milk samples are usually taken from milk tanks sampled from herds of 20, 50 or more cows. The herd size for bulk-milk testing is determined by the antibody response of seropositive cows to disease-causing agents, the intraherd prevalence of antibody and the sensitivity of the diagnostic test. Since every cow provides a different amount of milk in the bulk tank, and positive, infected cows often provide less milk, bulk-milk testing should only be considered as a herd-screening tool to determine disease prevalence or maintenance of the negative-herd disease status.

Pooled milk samples have an advantage compared to bulk or tank milk samples. Milk pools are usually made up in the laboratory by pooling equal volumes of individual milk samples.

Bulk milk and pooled milk samples can be tested by concentrating the immunoglobulin fraction,2 however, this method is generally considered too laborious for routine screening.3

When using milk samples as specimens for diagnostic testing with ELISA, certain precautions should be considered:

  • Samples of milk should be taken after cleaning and drying the tip of the teat, but antiseptics should be avoided.
  • Collect the milk in a clean container after stripping the first stream of milk from the teat.
  • Milk for serological tests should not be frozen, heated or subjected to violent shaking.4

For more information on how to run milk samples in ELISA, see the Technical Tip.

Disease control using milk testing

Note: The license status of the IDEXX products discussed in this article varies by country. Some products are not available for sale in particular countries, and not all products have approved milk testing claims in all countries. If you plan to use a particular product for milk testing, you should first determine whether that product has an approved claim for milk testing in your country.

Brucellosis

An extremely efficient means of screening dairy herds for brucellosis is by testing milk from the bulk tank. Milk from this source can be obtained inexpensively and more frequently than blood samples, and is often available centrally at dairies.

The indirect ELISA is the most sensitive and specific test for milk, and is particularly valuable for the testing of large herds.5

The IDEXX HerdChek* Brucella abortus Antibody Test is an indirect enzyme immunoassay that uses LPS antigens for the detection of antibody to Brucella in bovine milk samples. The assay has user-friendly, ready-to-use, standardized reagents for reliable test results.
More information >

The IDEXX HerdChek Brucella abortus Antibody Test gives interpretation guidelines for areas using vaccination to control brucellosis, and for brucellosis-free or nonvaccinated populations. The assay has been validated and USDA-approved for herds of up to 1000 animals.6

The IDEXX Brucella abortus test correctly detects the OIE strong-positive standard as positive when diluted 1:125 in negative serum and then again 1:10 in negative milk. This translates into a sensitivity that could detect a strong B. abortus antibody-positive cow in a pool of 1000 milk samples.

The assay also correctly detects the OIE weak-positive standard diluted 1:16 in negative serum and then again 1:10 in negative milk positive, which translates into a sensitivity that could detect a weak B. abortus antibody-positive cow in a pool of 160 milk samples.7

When a positive bulk or pool milk test result is obtained, all cows contributing milk, or preferably all cattle in the herd, should be tested serologically using milk, serum or plasma samples. Animals seropositive for brucellosis should be removed from the herd to eliminate the source of infection.

Conclusion: The HerdChek Brucella abortus Antibody ELISA is a sensitive, rapid and easy-to-use diagnostic tool for screening cattle herds for bovine brucellosis in milk and bulk milk samples.

Enzootic bovine leukosis

The IDEXX HerdChek Anti-BLV Antibody Test is an enzyme immunoassay for detection of antibody to bovine leukemia virus (BLV), the causative agent of enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL) in serum and milk samples.

Note: This test is USDA-licensed for serum only.

Dr. Carole Simard, from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, reported preliminary data obtained with the HerdChek Anti-BLV ELISA for serum and milk samples.8 Her data indicates that the IDEXX BLV ELISA, using milk rather than blood samples, might be used to diagnose bovine leukosis in dairy cattle. The test is sensitive enough to diagnose BLV in pools of sera (blood) and milk, individual milk, and bulk tanks.9

In Switzerland, Rosskopf, et al. found that the HerdChek Anti-BLV (Milk) had an agreement of 99.8% when testing milk samples, as compared to another commercially available BLV-ELISA.10
More information >

Conclusion: Testing milk samples for antibody to BLV using the HerdChek Anti-BLV (Milk) ELISA could be a cost-efficient screening for BLV infection in herd cattle.

Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV)

The HerdChek BVDV Antibody Test is an enzyme immunoassay for detection of BVDV antibodies in bovine serum, plasma and milk samples. The assay detects antibody to BVDV type I and type II strains, and shows a good correlation to virus neutralization assays.
More information >

Note: The HerdChek BVDV Antibody Test has not been approved for use in the U.S., and is available from IDEXX Europe only.

BVDV is highly infectious and transiently infects cattle, causing seroconversion usually 2–3 weeks post-infection. However, in herds with persistently BVDV-infected (PI) cattle, the percentage of BVDV antibody-positive cattle is very high, which can be detected in milk and bulk milk samples by using the HerdChek BVDV Antibody ELISA.

Testing milk and bulk milk samples for antibodies to BVDV can be a useful tool for initial screening for disease prevalence and for maintenance of the negative disease status in BVDV-free herds.

Kuhne, et al. compared three commercially available indirect BVDV ELISAs to a neutralization test using serum and milk samples. They found the IDEXX HerdChek BVDV Antibody ELISA detected seroconversion as early as 14 days post-infection, and was better at detecting BVDV II compared to the other assays tested. The same authors tested milk samples compared to a neutralization test, and found a sensitivity of 100% for the IDEXX HerdChek BVDV Antibody ELISA vs. 92% and 96% for two other BVDV Antibody test kit suppliers.11

Note: In cattle herds using BVDV vaccination, vaccine-induced antibodies may interfere with antibodies from transient BVDV infection. Therefore, disease control based on antibody monitoring in serum and milk should be done only in nonvaccinated herds.

Figures A and B: BVDV antibody-positive individual milk samples from Austria (Figure A) and other European countries (Figure B) were diluted in negative bulk milk samples. Depending on the amount of antibody to BVDV in the individual milk sample, antibodies could be detected in dilutions from 1:10 up to 1:80.
More information >

Conclusion: Persistently infected cattle are a major cause of BVD transmission. In immune-competent cattle, BVDV is highly infectious, causing transient infection and seroconversion of most cattle in the herd. In cattle herds having persistently infected animals, the percentage of antibody-positive lactating cows is generally very high. This should indicate the possible utility of the IDEXX BVDV Antibody ELISA for detection of BVDV herd infection in bulk milk samples from 50 cows (a size that is commonly used for testing).

Neospora caninum (N. caninum)

The IDEXX HerdChek Anti-Neospora caninum Antibody Test Kit is an enzyme immunoassay for the detection of antibody to N. caninum in bovine serum. The assay can be used for epidemiological studies and for management decisions to attempt to reduce the prevalence of neosporosis in cattle herds.
More information >

Note: This test is USDA-licensed for serum only.

Recently, Schares, et al. evaluated the IDEXX assay for the use in milk samples. Using a milk dilution of 1:2 and a cutoff of S/P 0.261 determined by TG-ROC analysis, they found that the IDEXX Anti-Neospora caninum Antibody Test Kit had a sensitivity and specificity of 90%, testing 791 paired milk and serum samples. They concluded that the test could be a potentially valuable tool to assess the herd status with regard to abortion caused by N. caninum.12

Use this link to download the article. Access to the article is enabled by a DocuRights® plug-in application. You will be guided through a brief installation process. After the plug-in is installed, the article will open automatically.

Graph 1
Linear regression on the S/P ratio results obtained from serum and milk samples of individual cattle with the HerdChek Anti-Neospora ELISA. Serum and milk results gave an excellent agreement (kappa 0.8).

Conclusion
The HerdChek Anti-Neospora Test is used worldwide to test cattle for infection with Neospora caninum, a major cause of abortion in cattle. Recent scientific data suggest that the test could potentially be used for milk samples to test for neosporosis in cattle herds.

Johne's disease (paratuberculosis)

IDEXX HerdChek M.pt. test is an enzyme-linked immunoassay for the detection of antibody to Mycobacterium paratuberculosis (M.pt.), the causative agent of paratuberculosis (Johne's disease). IDEXX M.pt. ELISAs are approved for serum and plasma samples and widely used in the U.S., Europe, Australia and other countries. View more information about the M.pt. tests.

The IDEXX M.pt. tests are not approved for milk testing, but currently, IDEXX is investigating the potential use of milk samples. Because a certain percentage of cattle will have low antibody levels in the blood, and even lower amount of antibody in the milk, the detection of positive animals from milk seems difficult. Because of the low intraherd prevalence of cattle seropositive for Johne's disease (mostly 5–25%), testing bulk milk would be unlikely to be of diagnostic value.

Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR)

Testing of milk and bulk milk samples for antibodies to bovine herpesvirus I (BHV-1), the causative agent of IBR, is widely used in veterinary diagnostic laboratories. Automated systems allow a rapid and reliable processing of those samples.13

IDEXX offers three IBR ELISA test kits (HerdChek Anti-IBR, HerdChek Anti-IBRgE and HerdChek IBRgB) that have been validated and approved for milk testing in the U.S. and/or other countries.
More information >

Note: The HerdChek Anti-IBR test is USDA-licensed for serum and milk. The HerdChek Anti-IBRgE and HerdChek IBRgB are available from IDEXX Europe only.

For the HerdChek Anti-IBR, Rosskopf et al. found in a study performed in Switzerland, an agreement of 99.8% testing milk samples compared to another commercially available IBR-ELISA .14

In the Netherlands, IBR control on IBRgE deleted-marker-vaccinated cattle populations is performed on milk and bulk milk samples. Wellenberg, et al. reported that the IDEXX IBRgE test had a sensitivity of 96% testing milk samples from marker-vaccinated and IBR-infected herds.15

The same group of scientists evaluated the IDEXX IBRgE test for the detection of antibodies to BHV-1 in bulk milk samples. On 500 bulk milk samples from BHV-1-negative herds from Denmark, the specificity of the IBRgE test was 100%. The sensitivity of the IBRgE test on 69 BHV-1-positive herds was 88.4%. The authors concluded the HerdChek IBRgE ELISA to be a suitable tool to detect herds positive in bulk samples when 10–15% of the animals within the herd had become BHV-1-gE-seropositive.16

Additionally, Frankena et al. found, in another study performed in the Netherlands using an IBRgB ELISA, that at an average herd size of 45 dairy cows, the introduction of a positive animal onto a negative farm often remains undetected.17

Note: ELISAs, including the IBRgE-ELISA, are increasingly used for the detection of antibodies in (bulk) milk samples, but have some limitations. A negative bulk milk test indicates that not more than 20% of the adult milking herd has antibodies to BHV-1. Many individual seropositive cows have a milk antibody titer less than 1/5. Consequently, it is not possible to declare a herd to be free from BHV-1 infection on the basis of bulk or pooled milk tests, and a negative bulk milk test should be followed up with individual serum samples from all cattle in the herd. For general surveillance purposes, bulk-milk tank tests can give an estimate of BHV-1 prevalence in an area or country. These should be supplemented by serum testing (individual or pooled) from nonmilking herds.18

Conclusion: All three IDEXX IBR tests, the HerdChek Anti-IBR, Anti-IBRgE and IBRgB ELISAs, have been demonstrated in independant studies to be useful to detect antibody to BHV-1 in milk and bulk milk samples. In approved countries, these tests are suitable tools to assess the IBR herd status. However, the tests should not be used to detect single IBR-positive animals in commonly used bulk-milk test sizes of 50 dairy cows.

 

References

1.

Forschner E, Bunger I, Krause HP. Surveillance investigations of brucellosis-, leukosis- and BHV-free cattle herds. ELISA-based bulk milk studies compared to single animal sample studies with traditional test systems. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1988;95(5):214–8.

2.

Forschner E, Bunger I, Kuttler D, Mehrkens L. IBR/IPV serodiagnosis with ELISA methods in blood, single milk and bulk milk samples; control measures for maintaining normal cattle herds; eradication measures with reference to vaccination. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1986;93(7):328–35.

3.

Frankena K, Franken P, Vandehoek J, Koskamp G, Kramps JA. Probability of detecting antibodies to bovine herpesvirus 1 in bulk milk after the introduction of a positive animal on to a negative farm. Vet Rec. 1997;140(4):90–2.

4.

OIE sampling methods. In: OIE Manual of Standards for Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines. Paris, France; 2000:5.

5.

Bovine brucellosis. In: OIE Manual of Standards for Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines. Paris, France; 2000:338.

6.

Brucellosis Scientific Advisory Subcommitee: Recommended herd size limit for the IDEXX milk ELISA test. One-hundredth Annual Meeting of the USAHA. Little Rock, Arkansas; Proceedings, 81–82.

7.

Commission Regulation (EC) No 535/2002, amending Annex C to Council Directive 64/432/EEC and amending Decision 2000/330/EC: Brucellosis—Standardisation of test procedure for pooled milk or whey samples.

8.

Simard C. (2004) personal. communication.

9.

Simard C. Testing Leukosis Through Milk Samples, Info-Holstein. 2002; www.holstein.ca/English/Info/jun02/index.html.

10.

Rosskopf M, Staub E, Ackermann M. Comparison of two ELISA systems for detection of antibodies against IBR/IPV and against bovine leukemia virus. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilk. 1994;136: 58–67.

11.

Kuhne S, Wolf G, Kaaden OR. Comparative testing of serum and milk samples in three different indirect BVDV antibody ELISAs and in neutralisation assays. 1. Riemser Diagnostiktage. 2003 Proceedings.

12.

Schares G, Barwald A, Staubach C, Wurm R, Rauser M, Conraths FJ, Schroeder C. Adaptation of a commercial ELISA for the detection of antibodies against Neospora caninum in bovine milk. Vet Parasitol. 2004;120(1-2):55-63.

13.

http://www.tecan.de/produkte/Local_Sol/

14.

Rosskopf M, Staub E, Ackermann M. Comparison of two ELISA systems for detection of antibodies against IBR/IPV and against bovine leukemia virus. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilk. 1994;136: 58–67.

15.

Wellenberg GJ, Verstraten ERAM, Mars MH, van Oirschot JT. Detection of bovine herpesvirus 1 glycoprotein E antibodies in individual milk samples by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. J. Clin. Microbiology. 1998:409–413.

16.

Wellenberg GJ, Verstraten ERAM, Mars MH, van Oirschot JT. ELISA detection of antibodies to glycoprotein E of bovine herpesvirus 1 in bulk milk samples. Vet Rec. 1998;142:219–220.

17.

Frankena K, Franken P, Vandehoek J, Koskamp G, Kramps JA. Probability of detecting antibodies to bovine herpesvirus 1 in bulk milk after the introduction of a positive animal on to a negative farm. Vet Rec. 1997;140(4):90–2.

18.

Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis/Infectious pustular vulvovaginitis. In: OIE Manual of Standards for Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines. Paris, France. 2000;885.


Back to the Top

THE LATEST NEWS

 Case Report

Serology interpretation for Newcastle disease virus (NDV)

In the March newsletter we discussed two different scenarios for NDV. We will continue the NDV serology discussion with two more cases. These serum samples were taken from 35-day-old broilers.

If these broilers showed an increased and/or persistent respiratory reaction after the first or the second vaccinations, you may need to consider that the increase in titers and the spread of the histogram is a response due to the vaccine virus itself. The lack of uniformity in the vaccine may suggest poor chick quality, an immunosuppressive condition caused by co-infection with IBD, CAV or a combination of both. A late field challenge could also be the cause of these types of graphs, but you would need to correlate the profile with an increased percentage of mortality and the type of lesions that you are finding at the necropsy.

This profile could be suggestive of an early field challenge. Alternatively, it could be suggestive of vaccine virus "rolling," which can occur if the broilers were vaccinated at the first day of age and they did not stop the vaccine reaction after 7 days post-vaccination. To understand the root cause of this type of profile, the flock percentages for morbidity, mortality and type of lesions observed during necropsy analysis also need to be correlated with the histograms.


 

TECHNICAL TIP

Back to the Top

Testing with milk samples

milk sampleWhen using whole milk, the samples should be centrifuged or allowed to stand undisturbed overnight at 4°C to allow separation of the cream layer. The samples intended for the assay should be drawn from below the cream layer because cream in the ELISA plate has the potential to cause unreliable results. Samples that have curdled should not be used.

Preservatives are commonly used to maintain the integrity of the samples over extended periods of time and varying temperatures. Two commonly used preservatives are sodium azide and bronopol. Customers performing milk testing with IDEXX ELISAs routinely do testing with preserved samples.


 

LEARN MORE

Back to the Top

To learn more about our products and services, innovative technologies, trusted service and support, and our global offices, visit our Web site.


 

VISIT US AT THE FOLLOWING EVENTS

Back to the Top

Ixtapa, Mexico—May 1–4, 2004
ANECA

Campinas, Brazil—May 5–7, 2004
FACTA

Florianopolis, Brazil—May 26–28, 2004
AveSui 2004

Istanbul, Turkey—June 10–12, 2004
World Poultry Congress

Des Moines, IA, USA—June 10–12, 2004
World Pork Expo: View the invitation (392 KB)

Berlin, Germany—June 16–19, 2004
5th International Symposium on Turkey Diseases

Hamburg, Germany—June 27–July 1, 2004
18th IPVS


 
 

WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU

Back to the Top

...and we want you to hear from us! Pass the following link along to your friends and colleagues. They can register for Animal Health Updates to stay informed of the latest IDEXX products and services and respond to various customer and market surveys that we will soon offer. Registration is easy at www.idexx.com/production/livestockpoultrynews.

 

Questions or comments?

 
* HerdChek is a trademark or a registered trademark of IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries. All other product and company names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders.
 

This symbol indicates PDF-formatted materials. To view, you may need to download a free copy of Adobe® Reader® software.

 
© 2008 IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
All rights reserved.